THE “SPEECHES” IN ACTS
THE “SPEECHES” IN ACTS
Virgil Warren, PhD
Besides historical narrative in The Acts, Luke includes significant verbal presentation from conversations, prayers, letters, and sermons. Below in order of appearance are the major examples of spoken material.
Selection of Matthias 1:16-22 Peter
Sermon on Pentecost 2:14-26, 38-39 Peter
Sermon at Gate Beautiful 3:12-26 Peter
First Defense to the Sanhedrin 4:8-12, 19-20 Peter
Prayer 4:24-30 Jerusalem Christians
(Ananias and Sapphira) (5:3-4, 8-9) (Peter)
Second Defense to the Sanhedrin 5:29-32 Peter
Gamaliel’s Speech 5:35-39 Gamaliel
Ministration to the Widows 6:2-4 The “twelve”
Stephen’s Speech 7:2-53, 56 Stephen
Denunciation of Simon the 8:20-23 Peter
Sorcerer
Sermon to Cornelius’ Household 10:34-43 Peter
Sermon to the Jerusalem Elders 11:5-17 Peter
Sermon at Antioch of Pisidia 13:16-41 Paul
" " " " " 13:46-47 Paul
Sermon at Lystra 14:15-17 Paul
Conference on Circumcision 15:6-11 Peter
Conference on Circumcision 15:14-21 James
Letter to the Gentiles 15:23-29
Sermon on the Areopagus 17:22-31 Paul
Speech to the Ephesian Silversmiths 19:25-27 Demetrius
Speech to the Ephesian Mob 19:35-40 the town clerk
Sermon to the Ephesian Elders 20:18-35 Paul
James’ Proposal to Paul in 21:20-25 James
Jerusalem
Sermon to the Jerusalem Mob 22:1-21 Paul
(Defense Before the Sanhedrin) (23:1, 3, 5, 6) (Paul)
Letter to Felix 23:26-30 Claudius Lysias
Accusation of Paul Before Felix 24:2-8 Tertullus
Paul’s Defense Before Felix 24:10-21 Paul
Inquiry Regarding Paul’s Case 24:14-21 Festus
Paul’s Defense Before Agrippa 26:2-23 Paul
Observations on this data include the following. (1) Most, if not all, the sermons are surely condensations. The sermon on Pentecost, for example, lasts only about two and a half minutes. The two letters preserved in The Acts could be complete since their length is appropriate to their purposes. Since the presentations by Paul and Tertullus in Caesarea occurred in official courtroom settings, Luke may have had access to stenographic records of what transpired. Nevertheless, they, too, are not apt to provide full accounts of accusation and defense.
(2) The several presentations of the gospel to first-time hearers maintain good variety. There is little repetition of Old Testament background, testimony from personal experience, or the form of polemic. Even the three accounts of Paul’s conversion vary significantly despite being condensations.
(3) Besides being informative, these discourse sections serve a rhetorical purpose: they heighten interest by creating variety, realism, and focus. They are to the narrative in The Acts what the logia (“sayings”) are to Luke’s gospel.
(4) Each speech fits its audience. The earlier sermons in Palestine are natural for Jewish hearers. Paul’s presentation to pagan philosophers in Athens follows a pattern they could appreciate. Similarly, his urgent words to the heathen worshipers in Lystra offer an interpretation of nature and experience rather than presuppose a knowledge of Old Testament revelation. There is respect in the way both Tertullus and Paul present themselves before Felix. The same demeanor is evident in Paul’s defense before Agrippa. Tertullus, an orator, has an especially flowery statement of accusation against Paul. Paul’s characteristic boldness shines through in his appeal to Agrippa right during the court proceedings (26:27).
christir.org
